Hi Tommy,

Thank's for this nice web page!

My name is Martin Lanius and I am from Berlin, Germany. I am very much interested in Teslas ideas after reading the great book from Margret Cheney. At the moment the world seems to be not ready for all of Teslas ideas, but the time will come. I think that Tesla was able to contact the huge source of knowledge which can be contacted by all of us, but only a few are able to do this. I think that Tesla is one of the very few which had this contact permanently.

At the moment I am especially interested in Tesla's power converter. Can you recommend me some sources, links to the construction of these converters (e.g. the converter he used in his car)?

Have a nice day!

Regards,

Martin

Putting the puzzle might be much easier if I actually could find a drawing of the circuit.

These two books will help you get a feel for the "ball park".

"Revolution in Technik, Medizin, Gesellschaft" - Hans A. Nieper - ISBN 3-925188-00-2

english: "Dr. Nieper's Revolution in Technology, Medicine and Society" - ISBN 3-925188-07-X

© M.I.T. Management Interessengemeinschaft für Tachyonen-Feld-Energie GmbH Friedrich-Rüder-Straße 1, 2900 Oldenburg, Federal Republic of Germany.

"The Sea of Energy in Which the Earth Floats" by T. Henry Moray - © 1978, Cosray Research Institute, Inc.

You said you read Cheney's book.

I have been working on "reconstructing" the research that lead up to the story I have at my site.

I am coming to understand what they went through, in developing their devices. I'm not sure, if having a lot of test equipment helps much. It gets in the way, as often as it provides insight.

If you haven't read through "The Resonate Coil Project", and all of its links, you'll need to do that also.

www.hbci.com/~wenonah/tommy/td.htm

Let me know if you come up with anything.

I'll let you know if I get anything other than a toy built.

Tommy Cichanowski

Hi Tommy,

finally I am back from the wonderful Australia. I read a lot about Nikola Tesla and got another interesting book which is from David Hatcher: "The Free-Energy Device Handbook - A Compilation of Patents and Reports". Do you know this stuff? I have some difficulties to get Moray's book. At the moment I am much more interested in the 'Permanent Magnet Electric D.C. Motor Generator' from Robert Adams, New Zealand. Do you have some experience with this kind of Free Energie Machine? On the other hand I am very interested in Atlantis, because I think that all the technical knowledge comes from this one source and Nikola was the guy who had a really good connection to this source. An interesting site is www.atlan.org.

Have a nice day!

Martin

I haven't read Hatcher's book. I have studied about 30 different designs to learn what they all had in common.

The Fariday (1791-1867) generator {N-Machine} has been played with for a long time.

I think the concept holds promise for many applications like electro-plating and metal refining.

The fact that it only outputs low-voltage, high-current DC limits the ways in which it can be used.

A problem with this concept, which is also shared with the Tesla Turbine, is we didn't have the right materials to build the device until receintly.

The N-Machine needs to spin very fast (40,000+ rpm) inorder to be efficient. All magnetic materials available right now will fly apart at those speeds.

Also, we don't have a material to use for the brushes to collect the electricity.

I have had a project growing in the back of my mind that I think would work if I had the funding for it.

I have friends from Los Alamos and Sandia and I think we could marry other projects we have worked on, to get this project to work.

The project would involve reinforcing the materials 'we' developed for today's computer hard drives, with some super strong materials 'we' developed for other things. See ...

www.hbci.com/~wenonah/new/milewski.htm

I will see if I can find a source for Moray's book. His approach is one of the best I have seen for home use.

I am courious about Alantis Also.

Tommy C

-----Original Message-----

From: lori moore
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2000 7:01 PM
Subject: free energy plans

Howdy

how about putting on the web the instructions on how you built the coil/light bulb unit?

what we can do to make our own unit.

Thanks

Monroe

I really would like to share, step by step, what I have been doing here, but there are a few considerations.

First, I am working with high power RF and there are some strict rules and guide lines.

The FCC requires that anyone working in this field be licensed or work directly with a person holding a first class FCC licensed.

You must have equipment to monitor the radio spectrum to be sure you are not interfering with any other communication system.

This is not going to be a device that you can plug your house into. Right now I'm looking at "self powered" radio transmitters, lighting units and space heaters. Things like air conditioning, for now at least, would work better with solar cells. (Things change so fast though.)

High power RF requires the use of special electronic components. Using consumer components will cause unwanted harmonics, or not to allow the circuit to work at all.

The physical arrangement of the components is very critical. A few millimeters change in the placement of a wire can cause the unit to work off frequency.

From the start I wanted to generate a set of plans that any high school student could follow to build his own. This will be possible some day. Save your large oat meal boxes.

Right now I'm not far enough along to be able to file the device with the FCC for approval.

Also, this device uses the negative solutions of Maxwell's equations. Because these solutions have been ignored in the past, there are no "Craft" tables or formulas to work from. This project has been one of winding coils and measuring their properties, and then trying to predict how they will behave when joined together. (A process that has really been messing with my mind.)

And if things aren't complicated enough already, I'm using tubes !!!

These will be replaced in the future, but I think I need to work with some of my friends from Los Alamos to create a new device.

If you haven't been scared off yet, and think you can play in this ball park, the manual for the device I talk about on the radio clip can be acquired from "Tucker Electronics". We paid $25.00 in 1996, and they charged it to our credit card. (Show more interest, get more information.)

This is a tube device, so you'll need to be good with tube technology.

I am also willing to show any apprentice that wants to come and study, everything I have played with so far.

Bottom line I guess ...

If you are not a Wizard or a serious want-to-be, hold tight, it may be cheaper to buy than build.

If a Wizard you be, and you want to help uncover Nature's Mysteries ...

Let me know what you have to work with, and how far into this you are able to extend yourself.

Tommy Cichanowski

To: tommycichanowski@excite.com
Subject: Re: Coil Project

Tommy,

As to your question about publication, for an observation to be published it must either be unique and be explained, or it must advance an understanding of a known phenomenon. By unique I do not mean a strange behavior that does not seem to work "right". The behavior must be shown not to have a conventional explanation and a demonstrated explanation must be provided. The latter requirement was the death of cold fusion. So far, I do not think your observations meet these requirements.

Your approach has a serious flaw in that you use fluorescent tubes as the load. These have a variable impedance that depends on the frequency and amount of applied power. In addition, the apparent light output is not linear with applied power. If the power is to be used for any purpose, it must be converted to a usable form. RF power is not very useful because it easily radiates out of the system and is lost. I suggest you rectify the RF to DC and use the DC to heat water. The heating rate would then give you a good measure of the power being generated. Many people who claim overunity using magnetic-electric methods fail to convince anyone because they do not do the most basic measurements properly. They get distracted by using devices they think they understand, meters for example, and fail to make clear, basic, and direct measurement of power. The most direct method is to apply the power to a resistor that is placed in a known amount of water contained within a Dewar.

The rate of change of temperature is a direct, unambiguous measurement of applied power. Of course, some care is needed to account for the heat capacity of the glass container. Nevertheless, this method removes any uncertainty about how the RF affects the meters.

Ed

I do agree. Fluorescent light tubes are about the worst load possible to demonstrate a scientific concept.

My first goal is to create a more efficient lighting system for growing plants. If I only manage to double current levels my work won't be in vane.

It is this "faster than light" stuff that generates the idea that this project might go into the over unity realm.

My plan for a stage 2 project, is to feed the output of my coil assemble into one of our RF dummy antenna loads.

If I feed 10 watts into my system and can't hold my hand on a 1,000 watt dummy, I'll know that the project is ready to demonstrate.

At this point we can do some good science.

I wonder though, How do we show a dynamic ether energy source?

One of the fun parts of this is that the computer (using conventional formulas) fails to predict any of E/H observations, only the E/I results hold up. So I see a mystery to play around with.

For now, lets say I'm exploring the use of novel electrical anomalies to increase the efficiency of lighting systems.

Tommy

June 21, 2000

FEATURES

Optiinizing the Signal

Thomas R. McGinley

This year's NAB annual rite of RF and signal optimization included the normal menu of transmitter and antenna topics.

It also included papers on emergency planning and preparedness, as well as network and Web-based remote control of transmitters and facilities. It also covered the distribution of broadcast audio over telecommunications network

Antenna science

The final paper of the session featured Manohar Lal, chief engineer of All India Radio, New Delhi India.

Lal presented theoretical details of a new-concept antenna, which produces high efficiency and high gain with small dimensions. The concept is derived from the modification of Maxwell's displacement current.

In the 1860s, James Maxwell formulated the equations upon which the laws of electromagnetic radiation are based. Lal states in his paper that Maxwell identified a displacement current from the extrapolation of Ampere's law. It was merely a charging current such as that which exists between the plates of a capacitor and did not radiate a magnetic field. Its current was uniform in the whole area between the plates.

Lal suggests that this displacement current can be modified to flow only at the periphery of the plates and thereby produce a magnetic field around it.

He claims to have tested the hypothesis and can launch a signal with gain, bandwidth and directivity properties, which could revolutionize the science of building antennas.

Tom McGinley is a 35-year veteran of radio engineering. He is employed by Infinity Broadcasting, for which he recently assumed managerial duties in the Seattle market. He is technical adviser to RW.